On January 22, 2013, in a unanimous decision, the US Supreme Court rejected a bid from 18 Hospitals to revisit 25-year old Medicare reimbursement claims.
In the case of Sebelius v. Auburn Regional Medical Center, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 11-123, the providers claimed that from 1987 to 1994 the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services undercalculated Medicare payments for care provided to low income patients, based on the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) fraction.
The US Supreme Court’s decision reinforces earlier decisions that the appeal was too old, where the imposed law governing these appeals is within 180 days of receiving the Notice of Program Reimbursement (NPR). By regulation, the Secretary of HHS authorized the PRRB to extend the 180 day limit, for good cause, up to three years. See 42 CFR 405.1841(b) (2007).
Should this same rationale apply to errors citizens make in calculating their tax liability? Do government vendors really need to also incur the expense of auditing payments received within a period as short as180 days, even where the particular agency is aware of an error in their methodology and chooses to not advise all other impacted?